The Colonel's daily subscription service is sadly now ended... but remember
you can still visit our FrothForum to catch all the latest dispatches and to discuss any of these minis! Click on the link for each entry to join the discussion!
|
01/02/04
So: I saw that you major question concerns the 40mm scale: "Really nice figures but which genius thought 40mm would be a good idea?" and similar. The fact is that our miniature are 40mm tall EXACTLY as many, many other GW and Confrontation ones! Our men-at-arms range is between 36 and 42 mm tall. The GW's Space Wolf Priest is 39mm tall. The GW's Kroot Shaper is 40mm tall. The Confrontation Shanys L'ombre is 37mm tall. A GW's Ork Nob is 39mm tall. So, what's the difference? It's only that we say our minis are 40mm scale, instead GW and Rackham says their are 25 or 28mm, but it isn't really true! Only WHFB miniatures are really around 30mm, all the other W40K minis are much closer to 40mm than 25. And Rackham ones, apart from dwarves and other little races, are all 40mm high or much, much more! So don't be afraid, our minis are perfect for all the scenery elements you have that fits the rackham and GW miniatures... and also fits exactly with the major part of ManorHouse Workshop's 28mm scale scenery elements... we're not so weird to make something that doesen't fit our own products! And a "pure-40mm" scenery elements line is in production right now... Furthermore, all miniature prices, as you'll can soon discover, are the same (or lower, in some cases) than GW and Rackham white metal miniatures. I hope this was useful to you to evaluate our work... of course we're always ready to hear from you any criticism or comment to improve our work. I'm at your disposal (also in PM at my address) to reply to any other question about Mindstalkers! - Jacknife
It is just that a lot of us still use older models as well as historical models, which are still in the 25-28mm range and it's then that the size difference becomes an issue. Of course, I've already resigned myself to the fact that my Rackham figures are unusable with most of my other stuff, so I'm prefectly okay with keeping them separately and using the larger figures for small skirmish games. So these should fit right in. It's a bit of a trade-off really, either you make 28-30mm figures compatible with the bulk of ranges out there, or you make something bigger, like 35-40mm to be compatible with the more popular ranges. Those with smaller figures will be upset for it, those with bigger will love you. - White Knight
I am currently involved in starting a new figure line in the UK also (purely in a financial partnership) and I have growing concerns because the figures are too large to be compatible with major figure lines. I think you'll find that many customers will shy away because of scale incompatibility. - oldmanGarth
|
|
02/02/04
I might be tempted to the odd figure, but at $4.40 it's still too rich for my blood.
|
02/02/04
|
|
|
02/02/04
While definitely 'impressionistic' in a lot of ways, they DO paint up nicely. It's weird, but they definitely look 1 million times better with paint. - Crusoe the Painter
As I recall, when Cobalt-1 was first touted, Bob Naismith was going to put it out himself. Then West Wind stepped in. Similarly, the Superfigs line is produced by Four-Color Figures, and only marketed and sold by West Wind and Old Glory, I think. |
02/02/04
|
|
02/02/04
|
|
03/02/04
|
04/02/04
|
|
04/02/04
|
|
05/02/04
|
|
05/02/04
1. a very much alive, but horribly mutilated giant I like him.
Other than the paintjob though, this is a cool mini. You don't see giants hobbling around on tree stumps too often, and while I agree with another poster that a more appropriate name might be "Frankenstein Giant", I think it's an original execution of the undead idea.
|
|
07/02/04
|
|
07/02/04
|
|
07/02/04
|
|
09/02/04
|
|
10/02/04
|
|
11/02/04
|
|
12/02/04
And, the various incidental animals will, as well. I'm not sure where they get "Warrior Thief" as the title for the guy with the sword. He's decked out completely in plate armor. Looks like just plain "Warrior" to me.
The 2nd bear indeed looks like droping dead. Might need to repose the arms to look like attacking. Full-plate for a thief? Silenced armour- sounds scary... The Bloodwolf is an interesting theme but the body seems to long but otherwise hard to syncronise 6 legs. I like the hatchlings. - Catinator
the excess shinyness, like i said, is probably a polish (toothbrush and vasaline) after the miniature is finished, alternativly he could be using vasaline instead of water to smooth the putty, which works well with armour, too much however leads to the green bubbling slightly when its drying.
|
|
15/02/04
|
16/02/04
I've forgotten to put the strap on the rifle which should be wrapped around his left arm - might be too late to add that now.
|
|
16/02/04
I usually see female dwarfs as being less... feminine I suppose (like alionas' take), but this one is a very good sculpts, style aside.
Rob wrote: "I'd have preferred a slightly narrower cock, but otherwise i really like it!" You'd be surprised how often I hear that. ta-da-tum-tscsch... - Hasslefriesian |
|
16/02/04
|
|
Back to Frothers Unite!
Main Page
Discuss miniatures on the Colonel
Marbles Frothforum !
Back to Colonel Marbles Main
Page